William Olney v. The State of Ohio

341 F.2d 913, 1965 U.S. App. LEXIS 6360
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided March 3, 1965·No. 16019_1·Published·Cited by 10 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an order of the District Court dismissing Appellant’s petition for a declaratory judgment because of lack of jurisdiction. The appeal was ordered submitted on briefs without oral argument.

In his petition Appellant sought a determination by the District Court of the validity of the sentence which he received in the state court upon his conviction of the offense of murder in the second degree. Appellant does not question the validity of his conviction, only of the sentence. In our judgment, in order to correct an alleged incorrect sentence Appellant’s remedy is in the court in which he was convicted. No constitutional question is involved.

The District Court lacked jurisdiction to consider the petition for declaratory judgment. Forsythe v. State of Ohio, 333 F.2d 678 (C.A.6, 1964).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

William Olney v. The State of Ohio, 341 F.2d 913, 1965 U.S. App. LEXIS 6360 (6th Cir. 1965).

341 F.2d 913 (William Olney v. The State of Ohio) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Boyle v. State
2025 Ohio 859 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2025)
Lingo v. State
2014 Ohio 1052 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2014)
Hill v. Tennessee
465 F. Supp. 789 (E.D. Tennessee, 1978)
Clausell v. Turner
295 F. Supp. 533 (S.D. New York, 1969)
Richard C. Ruip v. Commonwealth of Kentucky
400 F.2d 871 (Sixth Circuit, 1968)