William Louis Harrell v. Dallas B. Matthews

439 F.2d 721, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 10942
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedApril 5, 1971
Docket30385_1
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 439 F.2d 721 (William Louis Harrell v. Dallas B. Matthews) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
William Louis Harrell v. Dallas B. Matthews, 439 F.2d 721, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 10942 (5th Cir. 1971).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Judgment affirmed. Without deciding the precise question as to whether a written copy of the charges should have been served, we believe that on the facts of this case, the confusing notice given to petitioner and his mother of the charges against him did not meet constitutional requirements. See In re Gault, 387 U.S. 1, 87 S.Ct. 1428, 18 L.Ed.2d 527 (1967).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State ex rel. Taylor v. State
266 So. 2d 445 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1972)
Stanley George Andrews v. United States
439 F.2d 721 (Ninth Circuit, 1971)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
439 F.2d 721, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 10942, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/william-louis-harrell-v-dallas-b-matthews-ca5-1971.