State ex rel. Taylor v. State

266 So. 2d 445, 262 La. 1163, 1972 La. LEXIS 4846
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedSeptember 27, 1972
DocketNo. 52717
StatusPublished

This text of 266 So. 2d 445 (State ex rel. Taylor v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. Taylor v. State, 266 So. 2d 445, 262 La. 1163, 1972 La. LEXIS 4846 (La. 1972).

Opinion

BARHAM, J.,

is of the opinion the writ should be granted. The petition required in R.S. 13 :1574 was made on the same day the juvenile was brought to trial. This does not comply with notice required in In Re Gault, 387 U.S. 1, 87 S.Ct. 1428, 18 L.Ed. 2d 527. See also State in the Interest of Harrell, 254 La. 963, 229 So.2d 63. The dissent there was the federal rule applied in that case on review by the 5th Cir. Court of Appeal in Harrell v. Mathews, 439 F.2d 721 (1971). The proceeding had and evidence adduced do not comply with due process' requirements. See In the Matter of Winship, 397 U.S. 358, 90 S.Ct. 1068, 25 L.Ed.2d 368.

TATE and DIXON, JJ., are of the opinion the writ should be granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re GAULT
387 U.S. 1 (Supreme Court, 1967)
In Re WINSHIP
397 U.S. 358 (Supreme Court, 1970)
William Louis Harrell v. Dallas B. Matthews
439 F.2d 721 (Fifth Circuit, 1971)
State in Interest of Harrell
229 So. 2d 63 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1969)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
266 So. 2d 445, 262 La. 1163, 1972 La. LEXIS 4846, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-taylor-v-state-la-1972.