State ex rel. Taylor v. State

266 So. 2d 445, 262 La. 1163, 1972 La. LEXIS 4846
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided September 27, 1972·No. No. 52717·Published

Opinion

BARHAM, J.,

is of the opinion the writ should be granted. The petition required in R.S. 13 :1574 was made on the same day the juvenile was brought to trial. This does not comply with notice required in In Re Gault, 387 U.S. 1, 87 S.Ct. 1428, 18 L.Ed. 2d 527. See also State in the Interest of Harrell, 254 La. 963, 229 So.2d 63. The dissent there was the federal rule applied in that case on review by the 5th Cir. Court of Appeal in Harrell v. Mathews, 439 F.2d 721 (1971). The proceeding had and evidence adduced do not comply with due process' requirements. See In the Matter of Winship, 397 U.S. 358, 90 S.Ct. 1068, 25 L.Ed.2d 368.

TATE and DIXON, JJ., are of the opinion the writ should be granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Taylor v. State, 266 So. 2d 445, 262 La. 1163, 1972 La. LEXIS 4846 (La. 1972).

266 So. 2d 445 (State ex rel. Taylor v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re GAULT
387 U.S. 1 (Supreme Court, 1967)
In Re WINSHIP
397 U.S. 358 (Supreme Court, 1970)
William Louis Harrell v. Dallas B. Matthews
439 F.2d 721 (Fifth Circuit, 1971)
State in Interest of Harrell
229 So. 2d 63 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1969)