William J. LYNCH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PAN AMERICAN WORLD AIRWAYS, INC., Defendant-Appellee

475 F.2d 764, 17 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 524, 1973 U.S. App. LEXIS 10954, 5 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 8517, 6 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 353
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided March 22, 1973·No. 72-3782·Published·Cited by 45 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The sole issue presented by Plaintiff-Appellant in this appeal is that the trial court erred in granting the Defendant’s motion to strike Plaintiff’s motion for a jury trial. Plaintiff contended that he was discriminatorily discharged by his employer because of his race. Shunning the support of Title VII, 42 U.S.C.A. § 2000e, Plaintiff cast his complaint under 42 U.S.C.A. § 1981. He sought essentially reinstatement with backpay plus compensatory and punitive damages. The trial court found that the gist of the complaint was equitable, and, accordingly, denied Plaintiff’s request for a jury trial. We affirm.

A claim for reinstatement is equitable in nature. The imposition of monetary damages to make the employee whole for lost backpay does not change the character of the proceeding and thereby mandate a jury trial. Harkless v. Sweeny Independent School District, 5 Cir., 1970, 427 F.2d 319; Johnson v. Georgia Highway Express, Inc., 5 Cir., 1969, 417 F.2d 1122; Smith v. Hampton Training School for Nurses, 4 Cir., 1966, 360 F.2d 577; Williams v. Travenol Laboratories, Inc., N.D.Miss., 1972, 344 F.Supp. 163. Neither may the Plaintiff —by framing his prayer under § 1981 or by making unsupported allegations for compensatory and punitive damages —unilaterally alter the genre of the proceeding.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

William J. LYNCH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PAN AMERICAN WORLD AIRWAYS, INC., Defendant-Appellee, 475 F.2d 764, 17 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 524, 1973 U.S. App. LEXIS 10954, 5 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 8517, 6 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 353 (5th Cir. 1973).

475 F.2d 764 (William J. LYNCH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PAN AMERICAN WORLD AIRWAYS, INC., Defendant-Appellee) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Diaz v. Amerijet International, Inc.
872 F. Supp. 2d 1365 (S.D. Florida, 2012)
Kennedy v. Alabama State Board of Education
78 F. Supp. 2d 1246 (M.D. Alabama, 2000)
Beckett v. Atlas Air, Inc.
968 F. Supp. 814 (E.D. New York, 1997)
Mark B. Lebow v. American Trans Air, Inc.
86 F.3d 661 (Seventh Circuit, 1996)
Olivia S. Wauhop v. Allied Humble Bank, N.A.
926 F.2d 454 (Fifth Circuit, 1991)
Kozam v. Emerson Electric Co.
739 F. Supp. 307 (N.D. Mississippi, 1990)
Turner v. Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp.
602 F. Supp. 519 (M.D. Louisiana, 1984)
Laskaris v. Thornburgh
733 F.2d 260 (Third Circuit, 1984)
Daisernia v. State of NY
582 F. Supp. 792 (N.D. New York, 1984)
Mitchell v. Alex Foods, Inc.
572 F. Supp. 825 (N.D. Georgia, 1983)
Daniels v. Lord & Taylor
542 F. Supp. 68 (N.D. Illinois, 1982)
Thomas v. Resort Health Related Facility
539 F. Supp. 630 (E.D. New York, 1982)
Williams v. Owens-Illinois, Inc.
665 F.2d 918 (Ninth Circuit, 1982)
Novack Investment Company, Etc. v. Chester W. Setser
454 U.S. 1064 (Supreme Court, 1981)