William Hohri v. United States
793 F.2d 304, 253 U.S. App. D.C. 233, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 25919
Opinions
ORDER
Appellee’s suggestion for rehearing en banc has been transmitted to the full court. A vote was requested. A majority of the judges of the court in regular active service did not vote in favor of the suggestion. Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is
ORDERED, by the Court en banc, that appellee’s suggestion is denied.
Circuit Judges BORK, SCALIA, STARR, SILBERMAN and BUCKLEY would grant the suggestion for rehearing en banc. A statement is attached.
A statement of Circuit Judges J. SKELLY WRIGHT and GINSBURG is also attached.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
William Hohri v. United States, 793 F.2d 304, 253 U.S. App. D.C. 233, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 25919 (D.C. Cir. 1986).
793 F.2d 304 (William Hohri v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Rebecca Clarke v. Wisconsin Elections Commission
2023 WI 79 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 2023)
Jones v. Meridian Towers Apartments, Inc.
816 F. Supp. 762 (District of Columbia, 1993)
Dorman v. Thornburgh
740 F. Supp. 875 (District of Columbia, 1990)
United States v. Hohri
482 U.S. 64 (Supreme Court, 1987)
Empire Kosher Poultry, Inc. v. Hallowell, Penrose Van Buskirk, Jr., Max A. Block, John Apple, John Sharman, Euclid C
816 F.2d 907 (Third Circuit, 1987)
Cain v. United States
643 F. Supp. 175 (S.D. New York, 1986)
William Hohri v. United States
793 F.2d 304 (D.C. Circuit, 1986)