William Hernandez v. State

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in William Hernandez v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2014 Tex. App. LEXIS 12886
Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided March 13, 2014·No. 01-13-00825-CR·Published

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION

Cause number: 01-13-00825-CR Style: William Hernandez v The State of Texas Date motion filed*: March 10, 2014 Type of motion: Motion to substitute attorney and motion for extension Party filing motion: Appellant Document to be filed:

Is appeal accelerated? No

If motion to extend time: Original due date: January 3, 2014 Number of previous extensions granted: 0 Current Due date: January 3, 2014 Date Requested: N/A

Ordered that motion is:

 Granted If document is to be filed, document due: April 24, 2014  Absent extraordinary circumstances, the Court will not grant motions to extend time  Denied  Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot)  Other: _____________________________________ Appellant has filed a motion to substitute attorney, which is granted. The Clerk of this Court is ordered to substitute attorney Kurt B. Wentz for Ann Lee Mosley as appellant’s counsel of record. Appellant also requests that the Court provide a new briefing schedule for this case. The Court will construe this request as a motion for extension to file appellant’s brief. Appellant’s brief was due January 3, 2014. Appellant is ordered to file appellant’s brief no later than April 24, 2014. See TEX. R. APP. P. 10.5(b), 38.6(d).

Judge's signature: /s/ Justice Evelyn V. Keyes 

Panel consists of ____________________________________________

Date: March 13, 2013

November 7, 2008 Revision

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

William Hernandez v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2014).

William Hernandez v. State (William Hernandez v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.