William Hernandez v. State
This text of William Hernandez v. State (William Hernandez v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON
ORDER ON MOTION
Cause number: 01-13-00825-CR Style: William Hernandez v The State of Texas Date motion filed*: March 10, 2014 Type of motion: Motion to substitute attorney and motion for extension Party filing motion: Appellant Document to be filed:
Is appeal accelerated? No
If motion to extend time: Original due date: January 3, 2014 Number of previous extensions granted: 0 Current Due date: January 3, 2014 Date Requested: N/A
Ordered that motion is:
Granted If document is to be filed, document due: April 24, 2014 Absent extraordinary circumstances, the Court will not grant motions to extend time Denied Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot) Other: _____________________________________ Appellant has filed a motion to substitute attorney, which is granted. The Clerk of this Court is ordered to substitute attorney Kurt B. Wentz for Ann Lee Mosley as appellant’s counsel of record. Appellant also requests that the Court provide a new briefing schedule for this case. The Court will construe this request as a motion for extension to file appellant’s brief. Appellant’s brief was due January 3, 2014. Appellant is ordered to file appellant’s brief no later than April 24, 2014. See TEX. R. APP. P. 10.5(b), 38.6(d).
Judge's signature: /s/ Justice Evelyn V. Keyes
Panel consists of ____________________________________________
Date: March 13, 2013
November 7, 2008 Revision
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
William Hernandez v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/william-hernandez-v-state-texapp-2014.