William Henry Frison v. United States

322 F.2d 476
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit·Decided October 1, 1963·No. 7395_1·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, having been convicted of an offense against the United States from which judgment no appeal was taken, seeks to have produced at government expense the transcript of the trial proceedings and other documents because he “is going to make a collateral attack upon his conviction pursuant to the provisions of Section 2255, Title 28 U.S.C.A. * * * ” The trial court denied the application.

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons stated in Prince v. United States, 10 Cir., 312 F.2d 252; Pearson v. United States, 10 Cir., 313 F.2d 868; Lingo v. United States, 10 Cir., 320 F.2d 260.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

William Henry Frison v. United States, 322 F.2d 476 (10th Cir. 1963).

322 F.2d 476 (William Henry Frison v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related