Robert Thomas Lingo v. United States

Tenth Circuit

Robert Thomas Lingo v. United States

320 F.2d 260, 1963 U.S. App. LEXIS 4658

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

DecidedJuly 12, 1963

Docket7328

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 320 F.2d 260 (Robert Thomas Lingo v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Robert Thomas Lingo v. United States, 320 F.2d 260, 1963 U.S. App. LEXIS 4658 (10th Cir. 1963).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

A jury found Lingo guilty of a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 495 and he was sentenced to a term of five years. The trial court denied his application to secure at government expense certain records and the transcript of the trial proceedings. The time for appeal has passed and no application for post-conviction relief is pending. The denial of the application was proper. Pearson v. United States, 10 Cir., 313 F.2d 868; Prince v. United States, 10 Cir., 312 F.2d 252.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

A jury found Lingo guilty of a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 495 and he was sentenced to a term of five years. The trial court denied his application to secure at government expense certain records and the transcript of the trial proceedings. The time for appeal has passed and no application for post-conviction relief is pending. The denial of the application was proper. Pearson v. United States, 10 Cir., 313 F.2d 868; Prince v. United States, 10 Cir., 312 F.2d 252.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

320 F.2d 260, 1963 U.S. App. LEXIS 4658, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robert-thomas-lingo-v-united-states-ca10-1963.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack