William G. Rich, Jr. v. Honorable James P. Mitchell, Secretary of Labor

273 F.2d 78, 106 U.S. App. D.C. 343, 1959 U.S. App. LEXIS 3011
CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
DecidedNovember 27, 1959
Docket15143
StatusPublished
Cited by16 cases

This text of 273 F.2d 78 (William G. Rich, Jr. v. Honorable James P. Mitchell, Secretary of Labor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
William G. Rich, Jr. v. Honorable James P. Mitchell, Secretary of Labor, 273 F.2d 78, 106 U.S. App. D.C. 343, 1959 U.S. App. LEXIS 3011 (D.C. Cir. 1959).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, a former employee of the Department of Labor, sued the Secretary of Labor for reinstatement. His complaint, in the light of accompanying affidavits, comes only to this: The Director of Personnel notified appellant that unless he resigned within three days, the Department would bring certain charges against him proposing his dismissal, and these charges might lead to fine or imprisonment. The Director told appellant he could resign on any ground he chose and his resignation would be accepted. He was “frightened and upset”. He therefore resigned “To enter private Industry.” He tried, and was not allowed, to withdraw his resignation. He describes the Director’s statement as “threats and duress” and says he was “falsely accused”. But he does not allege that the Director knew or believed that the proposed charges were false.

The Director did not act illegally or improperly in telling appellant he could choose between facing charges and resigning. We agree with the District Court that the appellee was entitled to summary judgment. Competello v. Jones, 105 U.S.App.D.C. 412, 267 F.2d 689.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Walsh v. City of Chicago
712 F. Supp. 1303 (N.D. Illinois, 1989)
Margaret J. Schultz v. United States Navy
810 F.2d 1133 (Federal Circuit, 1987)
Thomas v. District of Columbia Department of Labor
409 A.2d 164 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1979)
Robert L. Molinar v. Western Electric Company
525 F.2d 521 (First Circuit, 1976)
Perlman v. United States
490 F.2d 928 (Court of Claims, 1974)
Harris v. Nixon
325 F. Supp. 28 (D. Colorado, 1971)
Glynn H. Goodman v. United States of America
424 F.2d 914 (D.C. Circuit, 1970)
Denis E. Cosby v. The United States
417 F.2d 1345 (Court of Claims, 1969)
Patrick F. X. McGucken v. The United States
407 F.2d 1349 (Court of Claims, 1969)
Anthony C. Autera v. The United States
389 F.2d 815 (Court of Claims, 1968)
Haine v. Googe
248 F. Supp. 349 (S.D. New York, 1965)
Paroczay v. Hodges
219 F. Supp. 89 (District of Columbia, 1963)
Popham v. United States
151 Ct. Cl. 502 (Court of Claims, 1960)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
273 F.2d 78, 106 U.S. App. D.C. 343, 1959 U.S. App. LEXIS 3011, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/william-g-rich-jr-v-honorable-james-p-mitchell-secretary-of-labor-cadc-1959.