Adele Competello v. Roger W. Jones, Chairman, United States Civil Service Commission

267 F.2d 689, 105 U.S. App. D.C. 412, 1959 U.S. App. LEXIS 3842
CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
DecidedMay 21, 1959
Docket14862_1
StatusPublished
Cited by9 cases

This text of 267 F.2d 689 (Adele Competello v. Roger W. Jones, Chairman, United States Civil Service Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Adele Competello v. Roger W. Jones, Chairman, United States Civil Service Commission, 267 F.2d 689, 105 U.S. App. D.C. 412, 1959 U.S. App. LEXIS 3842 (D.C. Cir. 1959).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This appeal is from an order of the District Court granting the motion of appellees (members of the United States Civil Service Commission, and the Secretary of the Interior) and dismissing appellant’s complaint for restoration of employment status in the Classified Civil Service.

Briefly these are the pertinent facts. Appellant submitted her resignation following (1) receipt of written notice of a proposal to separate her from the Civil Service but before any further action thereon, and (2) the advice of officials of the employing agency that the charges would not be withdrawn but would remain in her personnel file with her answer thereto. The resignation was accepted. Thereafter appellant received a copy of the Notification of Personnel Action (Standard Form 50) which recorded her resignation and noted that it had been accepted while removal charges were pending but before final decision was reached.

Appellant thereupon requested withdrawal of her resignation on the ground that she would not have resigned had she known that such a notation would appear. The request was denied by the employing agency and appellant sought review by the Civil Service Commission. The Commission held that the resignation was voluntary and hence it had no power to entertain the appeal.

We think the District Court was correct in granting summary judgment for the appellees and in dismissing the suit.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Blackwell v. BD. OF ANIMAL HEALTH
784 So. 2d 996 (Court of Appeals of Mississippi, 2001)
Thomas v. District of Columbia Department of Labor
409 A.2d 164 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1979)
Glynn H. Goodman v. United States of America
424 F.2d 914 (D.C. Circuit, 1970)
Haine v. Googe
248 F. Supp. 349 (S.D. New York, 1965)
Popham v. United States
151 Ct. Cl. 502 (Court of Claims, 1960)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
267 F.2d 689, 105 U.S. App. D.C. 412, 1959 U.S. App. LEXIS 3842, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/adele-competello-v-roger-w-jones-chairman-united-states-civil-service-cadc-1959.