William F. McKnight v. Howard M. Comstock, Supt. S.C.C., Henry W. Kerr, Chrm. Adult Auth.

Ninth Circuit

William F. McKnight v. Howard M. Comstock, Supt. S.C.C., Henry W. Kerr, Chrm. Adult Auth.

445 F.2d 317

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided August 4, 1971·No. 25854_1·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The denial of McKnight’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus is affirmed for the reasons given in the district court’s order of March 25, 1970. See also Ellhamer v. Wilson, 9 Cir., 1971, 445 F.2d 856 (July 7, 1971), reversing a district court decision on which McKnight relies. Denial of the petition without an evidentiary hearing was not error, since there are no disputed facts.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

The denial of McKnight’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus is affirmed for the reasons given in the district court’s order of March 25, 1970. See also Ellhamer v. Wilson, 9 Cir., 1971, 445 F.2d 856 (July 7, 1971), reversing a district court decision on which McKnight relies. Denial of the petition without an evidentiary hearing was not error, since there are no disputed facts.

Affirmed.

William F. McKnight v. Howard M. Comstock, Supt. S.C.C., Henry W. Kerr, Chrm. Adult Auth., 445 F.2d 317 (9th Cir. 1971).

Pincite

445 F.2d 317 (William F. McKnight v. Howard M. Comstock, Supt. S.C.C., Henry W. Kerr, Chrm. Adult Auth.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related