William F. McKnight v. Howard M. Comstock, Supt. S.C.C., Henry W. Kerr, Chrm. Adult Auth.

Ninth Circuit

William F. McKnight v. Howard M. Comstock, Supt. S.C.C., Henry W. Kerr, Chrm. Adult Auth.

445 F.2d 317

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedAugust 4, 1971

Docket25854_1

StatusPublished

This text of 445 F.2d 317 (William F. McKnight v. Howard M. Comstock, Supt. S.C.C., Henry W. Kerr, Chrm. Adult Auth.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

William F. McKnight v. Howard M. Comstock, Supt. S.C.C., Henry W. Kerr, Chrm. Adult Auth., 445 F.2d 317 (9th Cir. 1971).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The denial of McKnight’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus is affirmed for the reasons given in the district court’s order of March 25, 1970. See also Ellhamer v. Wilson, 9 Cir., 1971, 445 F.2d 856 (July 7, 1971), reversing a district court decision on which McKnight relies. Denial of the petition without an evidentiary hearing was not error, since there are no disputed facts.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

The denial of McKnight’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus is affirmed for the reasons given in the district court’s order of March 25, 1970. See also Ellhamer v. Wilson, 9 Cir., 1971, 445 F.2d 856 (July 7, 1971), reversing a district court decision on which McKnight relies. Denial of the petition without an evidentiary hearing was not error, since there are no disputed facts.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

445 F.2d 317, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/william-f-mcknight-v-howard-m-comstock-supt-scc-henry-w-kerr-ca9-1971.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack