Ellhamer v. Wilson

Ninth Circuit

Ellhamer v. Wilson

445 F.2d 856

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedJuly 7, 1971

DocketNos. 25919, 25953

StatusPublished

Cited by9 cases

This text of 445 F.2d 856 (Ellhamer v. Wilson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ellhamer v. Wilson, 445 F.2d 856 (9th Cir. 1971).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The orders granting writs of habeas corpus to Ellhamer and Hinnington, California state prisoners, are reversed. The district court will enter orders denying the writs.

We are asked to overrule our cases which have upheld California in not providing counsel on parole revocation hearings. This we decline to do. See High Pine v. Montana, 9 Cir., 439 F.2d 1093; Lincoln v. California Adult Authority, 9 Cir., 435 F.2d 133; Mead v. California Adult Authority, 9 Cir., 415 F.2d 767.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

The orders granting writs of habeas corpus to Ellhamer and Hinnington, California state prisoners, are reversed. The district court will enter orders denying the writs.

We are asked to overrule our cases which have upheld California in not providing counsel on parole revocation hearings. This we decline to do. See High Pine v. Montana, 9 Cir., 439 F.2d 1093; Lincoln v. California Adult Authority, 9 Cir., 435 F.2d 133; Mead v. California Adult Authority, 9 Cir., 415 F.2d 767.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

445 F.2d 856, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ellhamer-v-wilson-ca9-1971.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack