Willford v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Willford v. State

616 So. 2d 196, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 4161, 1993 WL 108085

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 13, 1993

DocketNo. 92-1337

StatusPublished

This text of 616 So. 2d 196 (Willford v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Willford v. State, 616 So. 2d 196, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 4161, 1993 WL 108085 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. State v. Cotton, 595 So.2d 957 (Fla.1992) (approving Cotton v. State, 588 So.2d 694 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991)); Burdick v. State, 594 So.2d 267 (Fla.1992). Compare Tucker v. State, 595 So.2d 956 (Fla.1992) (resentencing required where trial court did not indicate understanding that life sentence under § 775.084(4)(a), Fla. Stat. (1991), was permissive, not mandatory); Henry v. State, 581 So.2d 928 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991) (same).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. State v. Cotton, 595 So.2d 957 (Fla.1992) (approving Cotton v. State, 588 So.2d 694 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991)); Burdick v. State, 594 So.2d 267 (Fla.1992). Compare Tucker v. State, 595 So.2d 956 (Fla.1992) (resentencing required where trial court did not indicate understanding that life sentence under § 775.084(4)(a), Fla. Stat. (1991), was permissive, not mandatory); Henry v. State, 581 So.2d 928 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991) (same).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

616 So. 2d 196, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 4161, 1993 WL 108085, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/willford-v-state-fladistctapp-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack