Willford v. State
616 So. 2d 196, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 4161, 1993 WL 108085
Opinion
Affirmed. State v. Cotton, 595 So.2d 957 (Fla.1992) (approving Cotton v. State, 588 So.2d 694 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991)); Burdick v. State, 594 So.2d 267 (Fla.1992). Compare Tucker v. State, 595 So.2d 956 (Fla.1992) (resentencing required where trial court did not indicate understanding that life sentence under § 775.084(4)(a), Fla. Stat. (1991), was permissive, not mandatory); Henry v. State, 581 So.2d 928 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991) (same).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Willford v. State, 616 So. 2d 196, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 4161, 1993 WL 108085 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).
616 So. 2d 196 (Willford v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Henry v. State
581 So. 2d 928 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)
Cotton v. State
588 So. 2d 694 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)
State v. Cotton
595 So. 2d 957 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1992)
Burdick v. State
594 So. 2d 267 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1992)