State v. Cotton
This text of 595 So. 2d 957 (State v. Cotton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
STATE of Florida, Petitioner,
v.
Larry COTTON, Respondent.
Supreme Court of Florida.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen. and Marc E. Brandes, Asst. Atty. Gen., Miami, for petitioner.
Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and Cynthia A. Greenfield, Sp. Asst. Public Defender, Eleventh Judicial Circuit, Coral Gables, for respondent.
*958 PER CURIAM.
We approve Cotton v. State, 588 So.2d 694 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991), on the authority of Burdick v. State, 594 So.2d 267 (Fla. 1992).
It is so ordered.
SHAW, C.J., and McDONALD, GRIMES, KOGAN and HARDING, JJ., concur.
OVERTON, J., dissents.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
595 So. 2d 957, 1992 WL 63093, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-cotton-fla-1992.