Willard v. Sullivan
This text of 45 A. 400 (Willard v. Sullivan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
How far justice required the inquiries to Beaudry, upon the immaterial point whether the house cost more *492 ■or less than the contract price, should be allowed to go for the purpose of testing his memory, was a question of fact to be determined at the trial (Spalding v. Merrimack, 67 N. H. 382, 383; Baldwin v. Wentworth, 67 N. H. 408, 409); and his statements so made were not open to contradiction upon the other immaterial point as to whether he had been fully paid by the defendant for building the house. Sumner v. Crawford, 45 N. H. 416, 418; Dewey v. Williams, 43 N. H. 384, 386; Hersom v. Henderson, 23 N. H. 498, 506, 507.
Exceptions overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
45 A. 400, 69 N.H. 491, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/willard-v-sullivan-nh-1898.