Will Robert Claud Steinmann v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided May 24, 2017·No. 10-16-00137-CR·Published

Opinion

IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-16-00137-CR

WILL ROBERT CLAUD STEINMANN, Appellant v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

From the 13th District Court Navarro County, Texas Trial Court No. D35282-CR

ORDER

State’s Exhibits 1, 6, 7, 8, and 10 and Defendant’s Exhibit 2 were not included in

the reporter’s record in this appeal. A notation in the exhibit volume of the reporter’s

record indicates these exhibits were sealed. The Court needs to examine these sealed

exhibits.

Because the trial court clerk retains possession of the original exhibits after the

reporter has copied the exhibits to be used in the reporter’s record, see TEX. R. APP. P.

34.6(g)(1), the trial court clerk should currently be in possession of all the original exhibits. Accordingly, the trial court clerk is ordered to prepare and file with this Court, within 14

days from the date of this order, a supplemental clerk’s record containing State’s Exhibits

1, 6, 7, 8, and 10 and Defendant’s Exhibit 2. The supplemental clerk’s record should be

copies of the exhibits unless the nature of the original exhibit prevents the ability to

adequately present the content of the original exhibit. If, for any reason, a copy is

inadequate, the Clerk is ordered to notify the Court and forward the original exhibits to

the Court within the same stated time period. The exhibits, whether copies or originals,

will be maintained under seal by the Court.

PER CURIAM

Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Davis, and Justice Scoggins Order issued and filed May 24, 2017

Steinmann v. State Page 2

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Will Robert Claud Steinmann v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2017).

Will Robert Claud Steinmann v. State (Will Robert Claud Steinmann v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.