Wilkinson v. McGehee
This text of 651 P.2d 671 (Wilkinson v. McGehee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
*672 MEMORANDUM OPINION
Melvin T. Wilkinson, claimant, filed a workers’ compensation claim alleging accidental personal injury arising out of and in the course of employment. A Judge of the Workers’ Compensation Court found, inter alia, the alleged injury did not arise out of and in the course of employment, and this finding was affirmed by a three judge panel.
The Court of Appeals, Division II, reversed and remanded with directions by a memorandum decision which found in favor of claimant because of a preponderance of evidence. Certiorari has previously been granted. We now vacate the opinion of the Court of Appeals, and Affirm the Workers’ Compensation Court.
On review of Workers’ Compensation Court orders or awards, the reviewing court does not weigh evidence to determine preponderance thereof, but examine the record only to ascertain whether the order reviewed is supported by any competent evidence. Loggins v. Wetumka General Hospital, Okl., 587 P.2d 455 (1978); Sooner Const. Co. v. Brown, Okl., 544 P.2d 500 (1975). We have examined the record in this case and find the Order of the Workers’ Compensation Court is supported by competent evidence.
OPINION OF COURT OF APPEALS VACATED. FINDING OF THE WORKERS’ COMPENSATION COURT THAT CLAIM SHOULD BE DENIED IS AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
651 P.2d 671, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wilkinson-v-mcgehee-okla-1982.