Wilkinson Ex Rel. Wilkenson v. Moore & Preston Coal Co.

109 A. 45, 79 N.H. 335, 1920 N.H. LEXIS 5
Supreme Court of New Hampshire·Decided January 6, 1920·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Parsons, C. J.

If the driver caused the plaintiff’s injury and at the time was not acting within the scope of his employment, the defendants are not liable. Danforth v. Fisher, 75 N. H. 111; Dearborn v. Fuller, ante, 217.

As there was no evidence of a custom of drivers of coal wagons to employ assistance in unloading, payable in rides, or that the assistance was reasonably necessary in this instance, there was no answer to the uncontradicted evidence that the defendants’ drivers were not authorized to employ assistants or furnish rides.

There was no error in the refusal to submit this question to the jury. Dearborn v. Fuller, supra; Davison v. Parks, ante, 262. As the driver had no authority in fact or in law to invite the plaintiff *336 to ride because doing so was not within the scope of his employment, his invitation, if given, was not the invitation of the defendants. The ruling that the plaintiff was not an invitee was correct.

As the jury haye found for the defendants, it is unnecessary to consider whether a verdict should have been directed for them.

Exceptions overruled.

All concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wilkinson Ex Rel. Wilkenson v. Moore & Preston Coal Co., 109 A. 45, 79 N.H. 335, 1920 N.H. LEXIS 5 (N.H. 1920).

109 A. 45 (Wilkinson Ex Rel. Wilkenson v. Moore & Preston Coal Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Stevens v. Frost
32 A.2d 164 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1943)
Utica Mutual Insurance v. Langevin
177 A. 549 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1935)
Monnet v. Ullman
276 P. 244 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1929)
Wing v. Martin
141 A. 602 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1928)
Roulias v. Crafts
124 A. 194 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1923)