Roulias v. Crafts
This text of 124 A. 194 (Roulias v. Crafts) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Although the evidence shows that the plaintiff was •injured by the'negligence of the defendant’s chauffeur while driving the defendant’s car, it also shows that he was driving the car, not for the defendant, but on an errand of his own; that is, shows that he was acting for himself and not for the defendant when the accident happened; consequently the plaintiff cannot recover. Danforth v. Fisher, 75 N. H. 111; Dearborn v. Fuller, 79 N. H. 217; Wilkinson v. Company, 79 N. H. 335.
Exception sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
124 A. 194, 81 N.H. 107, 1923 N.H. LEXIS 25, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roulias-v-crafts-nh-1923.