Wilkins v. . Jones

25 S.E. 789, 119 N.C. 95
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Wilkins v. . Jones. Read the opinion of the Court — 119 N.C. 95
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided September 5, 1896·Published

Opinion

The defendants excepted and appealed from the judgment rendered in the verdict for plaintiffs. The description in the mortgage was as follows: "Thirty (30) acres of land, situated in Stony Creek Township, adjoining the lands of the lates James Woodruff, James Carter Jones and Richard Barnes." (96) There was error in the ruling of the Court that the description was too vague and uncertain to be explained by parol testimony. Perry v. Scott,109 N.C. 374.

NEW TRIAL.

Cited: Sherman v. Simpson, 121 N.C. 130; Hinton v. Moore, 139 N.C. 46.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wilkins v. . Jones, 25 S.E. 789, 119 N.C. 95 (N.C. 1896).

25 S.E. 789 (Wilkins v. . Jones) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Perry v. . Scott
13 S.E. 294 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1891)
Hinton v. Moore
139 N.C. 44 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1905)