Wilkins v. . Jones

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Wilkins v. . Jones

25 S.E. 789, 119 N.C. 95

DecidedSeptember 5, 1896

StatusPublished

This text of 25 S.E. 789 (Wilkins v. . Jones) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wilkins v. . Jones, 25 S.E. 789, 119 N.C. 95 (N.C. 1896).

Pincite

Opinion

The defendants excepted and appealed from the judgment rendered in the verdict for plaintiffs. The description in the mortgage was as follows: "Thirty (30) acres of land, situated in Stony Creek Township, adjoining the lands of the lates James Woodruff, James Carter Jones and Richard Barnes." (96) There was error in the ruling of the Court that the description was too vague and uncertain to be explained by parol testimony. Perry v. Scott,109 N.C. 374.

NEW TRIAL.

Cited: Sherman v. Simpson, 121 N.C. 130; Hinton v. Moore, 139 N.C. 46.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The defendants excepted and appealed from the judgment rendered in the verdict for plaintiffs. The description in the mortgage was as follows: "Thirty (30) acres of land, situated in Stony Creek Township, adjoining the lands of the lates James Woodruff, James Carter Jones and Richard Barnes." (96) There was error in the ruling of the Court that the description was too vague and uncertain to be explained by parol testimony. Perry v. Scott,109 N.C. 374.

NEW TRIAL.

Cited: Sherman v. Simpson, 121 N.C. 130; Hinton v. Moore, 139 N.C. 46.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

25 S.E. 789, 119 N.C. 95, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wilkins-v-jones-nc-1896.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack