Wilkins v. Commonwealth
This text of 443 S.E.2d 440 (Wilkins v. Commonwealth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Virginia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
dissenting.
Without reason, this decision overrules three decisions of the Supreme Court of Virginia. See Donahue v. Commonwealth, 225 Va. 145, 154-56, 300 S.E.2d 768, 773-74 (1983); Eccles v. Commonwealth, 214 Va. 20, 197 S.E.2d 332 (1973); Boyd v. Commonwealth, 213 Va. 52, 189 S.E.2d 359 (1972). I dissent.
For the reasons stated in Donahue, Eccles, and Boyd, I would hold that the trial judge erred in admitting evidence of the prior criminal conduct. Evidence of other crimes is not admissible for the purpose of showing the defendant has a criminal propensity and was conducting himself in accordance with that propensity. I would reverse the conviction and remand for a new trial.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
443 S.E.2d 440, 18 Va. App. 293, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wilkins-v-commonwealth-vactapp-1994.