Wilkes v. Equitable Life Assurance Society

New York Court of Appeals

Wilkes v. Equitable Life Assurance Society

43 N.E.2d 812, 289 N.Y. 63, 1942 N.Y. LEXIS 982

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedJuly 29, 1942

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 43 N.E.2d 812 (Wilkes v. Equitable Life Assurance Society) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wilkes v. Equitable Life Assurance Society, 43 N.E.2d 812, 289 N.Y. 63, 1942 N.Y. LEXIS 982 (N.Y. 1942).

Pincite

Opinion

*65 Conway, J.

This action was instituted to recover disability benefits under nine life insurance contracts. The disability of plaintiff was conceded and no defense was interposed as to six of the policies. The defendant alleged by way of defenses and counterclaims that the issuance of the disability provisions of the other three policies had been procured by false and untrue representations. Those defenses and counterclaims were established. The judgment rescinded the disability provisions in the three policies, declared them lapsed for non-payment of premiums (those which would have been properly waived during disability had there been no falsity of representation), awarded. defendant $12,300 for disability payments theretofore made, less the disability payments due plaintiff on the six unchallenged policies and costs and authorized the defendant to apply future disability benefits on those six policies toward satisfaction of the judgment. The Appellate Division modified by providing that the three policies should lapse only if the accrued premiums were not promptly paid and by correcting a mathematical error in the amount of the judgment.

We find merit in but one of appellant’s contentions. The defendant may not be permitted to collect its money award out of the disability benefits already due or as they become due under the six uncontested policies. That would be violative of chapter 626 of the Laws of 1934, now in substance embodied in subdivisions 2 and 5 of section 166 (formerly § 55-b) of the Insurance Law (Cons. Laws, ch. 28), providing that no disability benefits “ shall be liable to execution, attachment, garnishment, or other process, or to be seized, taken, appropriated or applied by any legal or equitable process or operation of law, to pay any debt or liability of such insured person * *

The judgment should be modified in accordance with this opinion and as so modified affirmed, with costs to the appellant.

Lehman, Ch. J., Loughran, Finch, Rippey, Lewis and Desmond, JJ., concur.

Judgment accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*65 Conway, J.

This action was instituted to recover disability benefits under nine life insurance contracts. The disability of plaintiff was conceded and no defense was interposed as to six of the policies. The defendant alleged by way of defenses and counterclaims that the issuance of the disability provisions of the other three policies had been procured by false and untrue representations. Those defenses and counterclaims were established. The judgment rescinded the disability provisions in the three policies, declared them lapsed for non-payment of premiums (those which would have been properly waived during disability had there been no falsity of representation), awarded. defendant $12,300 for disability payments theretofore made, less the disability payments due plaintiff on the six unchallenged policies and costs and authorized the defendant to apply future disability benefits on those six policies toward satisfaction of the judgment. The Appellate Division modified by providing that the three policies should lapse only if the accrued premiums were not promptly paid and by correcting a mathematical error in the amount of the judgment.

We find merit in but one of appellant’s contentions. The defendant may not be permitted to collect its money award out of the disability benefits already due or as they become due under the six uncontested policies. That would be violative of chapter 626 of the Laws of 1934, now in substance embodied in subdivisions 2 and 5 of section 166 (formerly § 55-b) of the Insurance Law (Cons. Laws, ch. 28), providing that no disability benefits “ shall be liable to execution, attachment, garnishment, or other process, or to be seized, taken, appropriated or applied by any legal or equitable process or operation of law, to pay any debt or liability of such insured person * *

The judgment should be modified in accordance with this opinion and as so modified affirmed, with costs to the appellant.

Lehman, Ch. J., Loughran, Finch, Rippey, Lewis and Desmond, JJ., concur.

Judgment accordingly.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

43 N.E.2d 812, 289 N.Y. 63, 1942 N.Y. LEXIS 982, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wilkes-v-equitable-life-assurance-society-ny-1942.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack