Wilkerson v. Harris

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 3, 2008·No. 08-6727·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-6727

WAYNE ELLIOTT WILKERSON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

V. O. HARRIS, III, Investigating Detective,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. William L. Osteen, Jr., District Judge. (1:08-cv-00071-WO-PTS)

Submitted: June 26, 2008 Decided: July 3, 2008

Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Wayne Elliott Wilkerson, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Wayne Elliott Wilkerson appeals the district court’s

order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and

dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915(e)(2)(B) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by

the district court. Wilkerson v. Harris, No. 1:08-cv-00071-WO-PTS

(M.D.N.C. Apr. 23, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wilkerson v. Harris, (4th Cir. 2008).

Wilkerson v. Harris (Wilkerson v. Harris) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related