Wilkerson v. Harris

Fourth Circuit

Wilkerson v. Harris

283 F. App'x 118

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 3, 2008·No. No. 08-6727·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Wayne Elliott Wilkerson appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1988 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Wilkerson v. Harris, No. 1:08-cv-00071-WO-PTS (M.D.N.C. Apr. 23, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Wayne Elliott Wilkerson appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1988 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Wilkerson v. Harris, No. 1:08-cv-00071-WO-PTS (M.D.N.C. Apr. 23, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Wilkerson v. Harris, 283 F. App'x 118 (4th Cir. 2008).

Pincite

283 F. App'x 118 (Wilkerson v. Harris) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related