Wildoner, Jr. v. Ransom
This text of Wildoner, Jr. v. Ransom (Wildoner, Jr. v. Ransom) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
GLYNN A. WILDONER JR., No. 4:23-CV-01116
Petitioner, (Chief Judge Brann)
v.
KEVIN RANSOM,
Respondent.
ORDER AND NOW, this 19th day of July 2024, in accordance with the accompanying Memorandum, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Petitioner Glynn A. Wildoner, Jr.’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is DENIED.
2. A certificate of appealability shall not issue, as Wildoner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right, see 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2), or that “jurists of reason would find it debatable” whether this Court’s procedural rulings are correct, Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000).
3. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case.
BY THE COURT:
s/ Matthew W. Brann Matthew W. Brann Chief United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Wildoner, Jr. v. Ransom, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wildoner-jr-v-ransom-pamd-2024.