Wildes v. Mairs

6 N.J.L. 391
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedMay 15, 1796
StatusPublished

This text of 6 N.J.L. 391 (Wildes v. Mairs) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wildes v. Mairs, 6 N.J.L. 391 (N.J. 1796).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

An action of trespass for an assault and battery, is a transitory action, and if the rule of the English courts of 1654, in its terms, extends to this description of action, it has never been so received and practiced upon in New Jersey. Besides, if it be a local action, the defendant will have every benefit of the exception on the trial by a motion for a non-suit.

Further, the general rule undoubtedly is, to bring forward a motion of this kind before the plea,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ross v. Vaughan
3 Johns. 442 (New York Supreme Court, 1808)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
6 N.J.L. 391, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wildes-v-mairs-nj-1796.