Ross v. Vaughan

New York Supreme Court

Ross v. Vaughan

3 Johns. 442

CourtNew York Supreme Court

DecidedAugust 15, 1808

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 3 Johns. 442 (Ross v. Vaughan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ross v. Vaughan, 3 Johns. 442 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1808).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

A rule has been adopted in regard to causes tried at the sittings in New-Tork. that where it is "made to appear, that the cause could not have been tried, had it been noticed for trial, the plaintiff, on a motion for a nonsuit, shall be excused from stipulating ; but this rule was not intended to be applied to causes "at th,e' country circuits, where the reason for it can seldom exist. The plaintiff must stipulate or be nonsuited.

Rule granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

A rule has been adopted in regard to causes tried at the sittings in New-Tork. that where it is "made to appear, that the cause could not have been tried, had it been noticed for trial, the plaintiff, on a motion for a nonsuit, shall be excused from stipulating ; but this rule was not intended to be applied to causes "at th,e' country circuits, where the reason for it can seldom exist. The plaintiff must stipulate or be nonsuited.

Rule granted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

3 Johns. 442, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ross-v-vaughan-nysupct-1808.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack