Ross v. Vaughan

3 Johns. 442
New York Supreme Court·Decided August 15, 1808·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

A rule has been adopted in regard to causes tried at the sittings in New-Tork. that where it is "made to appear, that the cause could not have been tried, had it been noticed for trial, the plaintiff, on a motion for a nonsuit, shall be excused from stipulating ; but this rule was not intended to be applied to causes "at th,e' country circuits, where the reason for it can seldom exist. The plaintiff must stipulate or be nonsuited.

Rule granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ross v. Vaughan, 3 Johns. 442 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1808).

3 Johns. 442 (Ross v. Vaughan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wildes v. Mairs
6 N.J.L. 391 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1796)