Wilder v. Toyota Motor Credit Corp.

Fourth Circuit

Wilder v. Toyota Motor Credit Corp.

334 F. App'x 562

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 23, 2009·No. No. 09-1807·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Lawrence Verline Wilder, Sr., appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Wilder v. Toyota Motor Credit Corp., No. 1:09-cv-01734-CCB (D.Md. July 8, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Lawrence Verline Wilder, Sr., appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Wilder v. Toyota Motor Credit Corp., No. 1:09-cv-01734-CCB (D.Md. July 8, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Wilder v. Toyota Motor Credit Corp., 334 F. App'x 562 (4th Cir. 2009).

Pincite

334 F. App'x 562 (Wilder v. Toyota Motor Credit Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.