Wilder v. Toyota Motor Credit Corp.

Fourth Circuit

Wilder v. Toyota Motor Credit Corp.

290 F. App'x 601

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 25, 2008·No. No. 08-1083·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Lawrence Verline Wilder, Sr., appeals the district court’s orders denying his mo[602]*602tion to reopen a civil action and denying his Fed.R.CivP. 59(e) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Wilder v. Toyota Motor Credit Corp., No. l:97-cv-01969-WDQ (D. Md. Dec. 4, 2007; Dec. 18, 2007). Wilder’s motion for appointment of counsel is denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Lawrence Verline Wilder, Sr., appeals the district court’s orders denying his mo[602]*602tion to reopen a civil action and denying his Fed.R.CivP. 59(e) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Wilder v. Toyota Motor Credit Corp., No. l:97-cv-01969-WDQ (D. Md. Dec. 4, 2007; Dec. 18, 2007). Wilder’s motion for appointment of counsel is denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Wilder v. Toyota Motor Credit Corp., 290 F. App'x 601 (4th Cir. 2008).

Pincite

290 F. App'x 601 (Wilder v. Toyota Motor Credit Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.