Wilbert Alexander Carter v. Georgia Department of Public Safety

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Wilbert Alexander Carter v. Georgia Department of Public Safety

DecidedMarch 3, 2015

DocketA15A1113

StatusPublished

This text of Wilbert Alexander Carter v. Georgia Department of Public Safety (Wilbert Alexander Carter v. Georgia Department of Public Safety) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wilbert Alexander Carter v. Georgia Department of Public Safety, (Ga. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________ March 03, 2015

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A15A1113. WILBERT ALEXANDER CARTER v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY.

Wilbert Alexander Carter brought a tort action against the Georgia Department of Public Safety and Xavier Jacquez Walker, Jr.1 The trial court entered an order granting the Department of Public Safety’s motion to dismiss, and Carter filed this direct appeal. We lack jurisdiction. “In a case involving multiple parties or multiple claims, a decision adjudicating fewer than all the claims or the rights and liabilities of less than all the parties is not a final judgment.” (Citations and punctuation omitted.) Johnson v. Hosp. Corp. of America, 192 Ga. App. 628, 629 (385 SE2d 731) (1989). Under such circumstances, there must be “an express determination that there is no just reason for delay” under OCGA § 9-11-54 (b), or there must be compliance with the interlocutory appeal requirements of OCGA § 5-6-34 (b). Where neither of these code sections is followed, the appeal is premature and must be dismissed. See id.; Turner v. Burhow, 205 Ga. App. 444 (422 SE2d 678) (1992). Here, it appears that Carter’s claims against Walker remain pending below. And because the trial court’s dismissal order does not reference OCGA § 9-11-54 (b) or make an express determination that there is no just reason for delay, it cannot be viewed as final. See Hadid v. Beals, 233 Ga. App. 5, 6 (502 SE2d 798) (1998). Accordingly, Carter was required to follow the interlocutory appeal procedure set

1 Carter also sued Shane Tyson Copeland, but he later dismissed his claims against Copeland without prejudice. forth in OCGA § 5-6-34 (b). His failure to do so deprives us of jurisdiction over this appeal, which is hereby DISMISSED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia 03/03/2015 Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________ March 03, 2015

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A15A1113. WILBERT ALEXANDER CARTER v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY.

Wilbert Alexander Carter brought a tort action against the Georgia Department of Public Safety and Xavier Jacquez Walker, Jr.1 The trial court entered an order granting the Department of Public Safety’s motion to dismiss, and Carter filed this direct appeal. We lack jurisdiction. “In a case involving multiple parties or multiple claims, a decision adjudicating fewer than all the claims or the rights and liabilities of less than all the parties is not a final judgment.” (Citations and punctuation omitted.) Johnson v. Hosp. Corp. of America, 192 Ga. App. 628, 629 (385 SE2d 731) (1989). Under such circumstances, there must be “an express determination that there is no just reason for delay” under OCGA § 9-11-54 (b), or there must be compliance with the interlocutory appeal requirements of OCGA § 5-6-34 (b). Where neither of these code sections is followed, the appeal is premature and must be dismissed. See id.; Turner v. Burhow, 205 Ga. App. 444 (422 SE2d 678) (1992). Here, it appears that Carter’s claims against Walker remain pending below. And because the trial court’s dismissal order does not reference OCGA § 9-11-54 (b) or make an express determination that there is no just reason for delay, it cannot be viewed as final. See Hadid v. Beals, 233 Ga. App. 5, 6 (502 SE2d 798) (1998). Accordingly, Carter was required to follow the interlocutory appeal procedure set

1 Carter also sued Shane Tyson Copeland, but he later dismissed his claims against Copeland without prejudice. forth in OCGA § 5-6-34 (b). His failure to do so deprives us of jurisdiction over this appeal, which is hereby DISMISSED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia 03/03/2015 Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Wilbert Alexander Carter v. Georgia Department of Public Safety, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wilbert-alexander-carter-v-georgia-department-of-p-gactapp-2015.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack