Wihly Harpo-Brown v. Public Storage

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedOctober 21, 2020
DocketA21D0079
StatusPublished

This text of Wihly Harpo-Brown v. Public Storage (Wihly Harpo-Brown v. Public Storage) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wihly Harpo-Brown v. Public Storage, (Ga. Ct. App. 2020).

Opinion

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________ October 21, 2020

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A21D0079. WIHLY HARPO-BROWN v. PUBLIC STORAGE et al.

Wihly Harpo-Brown filed two civil actions in the trial court against Public Storage and several other defendants, Case Nos. 2019CV320804 and 2019CV325973. Marvette Collier and Davioun Collier filed a separate civil action in the trial court, Case No. 2019CV324788, apparently setting forth some of the same facts Harpo-Brown raised in one of his actions. In September 2020, the trial court entered a final order that, among other things, dismissed all three actions. Harpo- Brown filed this application for discretionary appeal, seeking to appeal from that order. OCGA § 5-6-34 (a) (1) authorizes direct appeals from “final judgments, that is to say, where the case is no longer pending in the court below[.]” This Court will grant an otherwise timely application for discretionary appeal if the lower court’s order is subject to direct appeal. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (j). Accordingly, this discretionary application is hereby GRANTED with respect to trial court Case Nos. 2019CV320804 and 2019CV325973. Harpo-Brown shall have ten days from the date of this order to file notices of appeal in the trial court in Case Nos. 2019CV320804 and 2019CV325973. If Harpo-Brown has already filed notices of appeal in these cases from the order at issue here, he need not file a second notice in each case. The clerk of the trial court is DIRECTED to include a copy of this order in the records of each case transmitted to the Court of Appeals. However, Harpo-Brown was not a party to trial court Case No. 2019CV324788. “It is well settled that only a party to the case can appeal from a judgment, or one who has sought to become a party as by way of intervention and has been denied the right to do so.” Ford v. Reddick, 319 Ga. App. 482, 482-483 (1) (735 SE2d 809) (2012) (citations omitted). Accordingly, Harpo-Brown does not have standing to appeal the dismissal of Case No. 2019CV324788, and this application is hereby DISMISSED as to that case. See OCGA § 5-6-33 (a) (1); Thaxton v. Norfolk Southern Corp., 287 Ga. App. 347, 349 (1) (652 SE2d 161) (2007) (only party to the case below has standing to appeal).

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 10/21/2020 I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Thaxton v. Norfolk Southern Corp.
652 S.E.2d 161 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2007)
Ford v. Reddick
735 S.E.2d 809 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Wihly Harpo-Brown v. Public Storage, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wihly-harpo-brown-v-public-storage-gactapp-2020.