Wight v. People

15 Ill. 417
CourtIllinois Supreme Court
DecidedJune 15, 1854
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 15 Ill. 417 (Wight v. People) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wight v. People, 15 Ill. 417 (Ill. 1854).

Opinion

Treat, C. J.

The constitution requires all prosecutions to be carried on “ in the name and by the authority of the people of the State of Illinois. The cases of Donnelly v. The People, 11 Illinois, 552, and The People v. The Mississippi and Atlantic Railroad Company, 13 Ib. 66, decides that an information in the nature of a quo warranto is a prosecution within the meaning of that provision. The information in this case was not presented in the mode prescribed by the constitution. It was not exhibited “ in the name and by the authority of the people of the State of Illinois.” But it runs in the name of the State’s attorney, “ who sues for the people in this behalf.” On the authority of the cases already cited, it is substantially defective, and clearly insufficient to support the judgment pronounced by the court.

The judgment is reversed.

Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People Ex Rel. Seegren v. Sackett
184 N.E. 646 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1933)
Brooks v. State
79 A. 790 (Supreme Court of Delaware, 1911)
State ex rel. Broatch v. Moores
76 N.W. 530 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1898)
Attorney General v. Sullivan
28 L.R.A. 455 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1895)
Hay v. People
59 Ill. 94 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1871)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
15 Ill. 417, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wight-v-people-ill-1854.