Hay v. People

59 Ill. 94
CourtIllinois Supreme Court
DecidedJune 15, 1871
StatusPublished
Cited by9 cases

This text of 59 Ill. 94 (Hay v. People) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hay v. People, 59 Ill. 94 (Ill. 1871).

Opinion

Per Curiam:

This is a proceeding in the nature of a writ of quo warranto.

The motion to quash should have been sustained. The information does not run, “in the name and by the authority of the People of the State of Illinois,” as required by the constitution.

These words can not be dispensed with. They constitute matter of substance, and advantage can be taken of their omission, in arrest or on error.

This proceeding is a prosecution, and the language of the constitution must be used, as in indictments. Wright v. The People, 15 Ill. 417; Donnelly v. The People, 11 Ill. 552.

The judgment is reversed.

Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Village of LaGrange v. Clark
278 Ill. App. 269 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1934)
People v. Whitmer
243 Ill. App. 244 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1927)
State of Illinois v. Froelich
146 N.E. 733 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1925)
People v. Gartenstein
94 N.E. 128 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1911)
State ex rel. Broatch v. Moores
76 N.W. 530 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1898)
Moutray v. People ex rel. Morris
44 N.E. 496 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1896)
Attorney General v. Sullivan
28 L.R.A. 455 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1895)
State v. Hazledahl
52 N.W. 315 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1892)
Illinois ex rel. Hunt v. Illinois Cent. R.
33 F. 721 (U.S. Circuit Court, 1888)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
59 Ill. 94, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hay-v-people-ill-1871.