Wight v. Geer
1 Root 474
This text of 1 Root 474 (Wight v. Geer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Wight v. Geer, 1 Root 474 (Colo. 1792).
Opinion
Judgment of the County Court affirmed. It being against the law, to execute notes on the Lord’s day.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
State v. Zwerdling
206 A.2d 485 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 1964)
Ex parte Burk
2 Colo. L. Rep. 150 (California Supreme Court, 1881)
Ex parte Burke
59 Cal. 6 (California Supreme Court, 1881)
Tucker v. West
29 Ark. 386 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1874)
Raines v. Watson
2 W. Va. 371 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1868)
Dennis v. Sharman
31 Ga. 607 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1860)
Neal v. Crew
12 Ga. 93 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1852)
Towle v. Larrabee
26 Me. 464 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1847)
Lovejoy v. Whipple
18 Vt. 379 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1846)
Northrup v. Foot
14 Wend. 248 (New York Supreme Court, 1835)
Story v. Elliot
8 Cow. 27 (Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors, 1827)
Fox v. Abel
2 Conn. 541 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1818)
Geer v. Putnam
10 Mass. 312 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1813)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
1 Root 474, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wight-v-geer-conn-1792.