Wigginton v. Markley

California Supreme Court

Wigginton v. Markley

52 Cal. 411

CourtCalifornia Supreme Court

DecidedJuly 1, 1877

DocketNo. 5609

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 52 Cal. 411 (Wigginton v. Markley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wigginton v. Markley, 52 Cal. 411 (Cal. 1877).

Pincite

Opinion

By the Court :

The writ is denied.

Mr. Justice Crockett, concurring specially, said:

I wish to state, for myself, that I concur in the order denying the application for the writ, on the ground that the Clerk has [412]*412no authority to correct the record as it stands, for the reason that the records are under the control of the Board of Supervisors ; and if there is to he any correction of the record, or any change in any way, it must be under some proceeding had by the Board of Supervisors. Therefore, a writ of this kind, directed to the Clerk, would be unavailing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the Court :

The writ is denied.

Mr. Justice Crockett, concurring specially, said:

I wish to state, for myself, that I concur in the order denying the application for the writ, on the ground that the Clerk has [412]*412no authority to correct the record as it stands, for the reason that the records are under the control of the Board of Supervisors ; and if there is to he any correction of the record, or any change in any way, it must be under some proceeding had by the Board of Supervisors. Therefore, a writ of this kind, directed to the Clerk, would be unavailing.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

52 Cal. 411, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wigginton-v-markley-cal-1877.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack