Wigginton v. Markley

52 Cal. 411
California Supreme Court·Decided July 1, 1877·No. No. 5609·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

By the Court :

The writ is denied.

Mr. Justice Crockett, concurring specially, said:

I wish to state, for myself, that I concur in the order denying the application for the writ, on the ground that the Clerk has [412]*412no authority to correct the record as it stands, for the reason that the records are under the control of the Board of Supervisors ; and if there is to he any correction of the record, or any change in any way, it must be under some proceeding had by the Board of Supervisors. Therefore, a writ of this kind, directed to the Clerk, would be unavailing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wigginton v. Markley, 52 Cal. 411 (Cal. 1877).

52 Cal. 411 (Wigginton v. Markley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State Ex Rel. William R. Compton Co. v. Walter
23 S.W.2d 167 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1929)
Swamp-Land Reclamation District No. 407 v. Wilcox
14 P. 843 (California Supreme Court, 1887)