Wiggins v. State
636 So. 2d 202, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 4706, 1994 WL 182041
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Wiggins v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 654 So. 2d 1017 →
Opinion
We affirm appellant’s judgment and sentence. However, we remand for the trial [203]*203court to reconcile and correct discrepancies between the written judgment and sentence, the order of revocation, and the oral pronouncements at the revocation hearing. See Maddox v. State, 619 So.2d 473 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993); Williams v. State, 604 So.2d 8 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Wiggins v. State, 636 So. 2d 202, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 4706, 1994 WL 182041 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).
636 So. 2d 202 (Wiggins v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Williams v. State
604 So. 2d 8 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)
Maddox v. State
619 So. 2d 473 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)