Wiggins v. Murphy

576 F.2d 572
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 1, 1978·No. No. 77-2174·Published·Cited by 10 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff brought this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 seeking to have six state criminal convictions declared illegal and expunged from his records. Citing the fact that the plaintiff had tried the same issues in state court and lost, the district court dismissed the action on the basis of either “res judicata, full faith and credit, or outright lack of jurisdiction . . .” We affirm the dismissal, but only on the basis of res judicata.

This court recently held that the doctrine of res judicata does apply to § 1983 actions. Rimmer v. Fayetteville Police Department, 567 F.2d 273, 276 (4th Cir. 1977). We perceive no reason why res judicata should not bar the relitigation in this case of the same issues which were decided by the state courts. Accordingly, for the reasons stated herein, the judgment of the district court is

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wiggins v. Murphy, 576 F.2d 572 (4th Cir. 1978).

576 F.2d 572 (Wiggins v. Murphy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Smith v. Garrett
586 F. Supp. 517 (N.D. West Virginia, 1984)
Proside v. Haring
667 F.2d 1133 (Fourth Circuit, 1981)
Prosise v. Haring
667 F.2d 1133 (Fourth Circuit, 1981)
Yow v. Crater
526 F. Supp. 240 (M.D. North Carolina, 1981)
Holsey v. Bass
519 F. Supp. 395 (D. Maryland, 1981)
Allen v. McCurry
449 U.S. 90 (Supreme Court, 1980)
Lomax v. Smith
501 F. Supp. 119 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1980)
Welch v. BOARD OF ED. OF BALTIMORE CTY.
477 F. Supp. 959 (D. Maryland, 1979)
Wiggins v. Murphy
576 F.2d 572 (Fourth Circuit, 1978)