Wiedenmayer v. Villanueva
This text of 259 A.2d 465 (Wiedenmayer v. Villanueva) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
GUSTAVE E. WIEDENMAYER, ET AL., ETC., PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS,
v.
CHARLES E. VILLANUEVA, GUARDIAN AD LITEM FOR BRUCE ALEXANDER JOHNSON AND JENNIE ANNE JOSEPHINE JOHNSON, MINORS, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT, JOHN SEWARD JOHNSON, III, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
The Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Mr. Charles E. Villanueva argued the cause for the appellant (Messrs. Van Riper, Belmont, & Villanueva, attorneys; Messrs. Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft, of the New York bar, of counsel).
Mr. James C. Pitney argued the cause for the plaintiffs-respondents (Messrs. Pitney, Hardin & Kipp, attorneys).
Mr. Alfred C. Clapp argued the cause as Guardian ad litem for John Seward Johnson, III and Clelia Constance Johnson (Messrs. Clapp & Eisenberg, attorneys).
Mr. Thomas J. Bitar argued the cause for R. Carter Nicholas, Guardian ad Litem for Certain Minors (Messrs. Jeffers & Dillon, attorneys).
PER CURIAM.
The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the majority opinion of Judge Kilkenny in the Appellate Division, 106 N.J. Super. 161.
For affirmance Chief Justice WEINTRAUB and Justices JACOBS, FRANCIS, PROCTOR, HALL, SCHETTINO and HANEMAN 7.
For reversal None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
259 A.2d 465, 55 N.J. 81, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wiedenmayer-v-villanueva-nj-1969.