Widewaters Aroostook Centre Co. v. Noah's of Copley Place, Inc.

267 A.D.2d 995, 700 N.Y.S.2d 322, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13735

This text of 267 A.D.2d 995 (Widewaters Aroostook Centre Co. v. Noah's of Copley Place, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Widewaters Aroostook Centre Co. v. Noah's of Copley Place, Inc., 267 A.D.2d 995, 700 N.Y.S.2d 322, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13735 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Opinion

—Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance with the following Memorandum: Before completion of plaintiffs shopping center in Maine, the parties entered into a lease pursuant to which defendant would [996]*996operate a gift shop there. The lease, which by its terms is to be construed pursuant to Maine law, was for 10 years but either party had the right to terminate it after three years if the tenant was not in default and had annual minimum gross sales of less than $375 per square foot “during the third full Lease Year”. The lease provided for six months’ prior written notice of termination, to be given within 60 days after the end of the third full lease year. Defendant contends that notice could be given at any time before March 1, 1997, and that it gave notice of termination by an undated letter that plaintiff rejected as untimely on September 20, 1996. Supreme Court properly determined that the lease is, not ambiguous (see generally, Gagne v Stevens, 696 A2d 411, 414 [Me]; see also, Kandlis v Huotari, 678 A2d 41, 43 [Me]; Town of Lisbon v Thayer Corp., 675 A2d 514, 516 [Me]), and agreed with plaintiff that notice was permissible only between January 1 and March 1, 1997. The termination provision is triggered only if the tenant’s annual minimum gross sales during the third full lease year are less than the specified amount, and thus either party had the option to give notice terminating the lease between January 1 and March 1, 1997 after the third full lease year if in fact that amount was not reached. The court therefore properly granted that part of plaintiffs motion seeking dismissal of the third affirmative defense.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gagne v. Stevens
1997 ME 88 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1997)
Kandlis v. Huotari
678 A.2d 41 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1996)
Granger Northern, Inc. v. Cianchette
572 A.2d 136 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1990)
Frost Vacationland Properties, Inc. v. Palmer
1999 ME 15 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1999)
Town of Lisbon v. Thayer Corp.
675 A.2d 514 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1996)
Rodrigue v. Rodrigue
1997 ME 99 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
267 A.D.2d 995, 700 N.Y.S.2d 322, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13735, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/widewaters-aroostook-centre-co-v-noahs-of-copley-place-inc-nyappdiv-1999.