Wickwire v. Commissioner

10 B.T.A. 102, 1928 BTA LEXIS 4199
CourtUnited States Board of Tax Appeals
DecidedJanuary 21, 1928
DocketDocket No. 5574.
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 10 B.T.A. 102 (Wickwire v. Commissioner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Board of Tax Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wickwire v. Commissioner, 10 B.T.A. 102, 1928 BTA LEXIS 4199 (bta 1928).

Opinion

[103]*103OPINION.

Littleton:

Upon the facts in this proceeding, the period within which the Commisioner could make collection of any deficiency for the year 1917 expired under the statute prior to his determination of May 18, 1925. The five-year period of limitation would have expired March, 1923, but for the consent entered into by the petitioner and the Commissioner. This consent operated to suspend the running of the statute of limitations only until April 1, 1924. Wirt Franklin, 7 B. T. A. 636; O’Neill Machine Co., 9 B. T. A. 567; Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corporation, Ltd., 6 B. T. A. 1045.

Judgment of no deficiency will he entered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wickwire v. Commissioner
10 B.T.A. 102 (Board of Tax Appeals, 1928)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
10 B.T.A. 102, 1928 BTA LEXIS 4199, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wickwire-v-commissioner-bta-1928.