Whyte v. Lindblom
This text of 255 N.W. 267 (Whyte v. Lindblom) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wisconsin Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The controlling questions which' determine this case are treated in the case of Jessel S. Whyte v. Lindblom, ante, p. 21, 255 N. W. 265, 256 N. W. 244. The negligence of the driver of the car owned by respondent is not attributable to the latter. The car was in the possession of a bailee when it was damaged, and respondent is entitled to recover for that damage.
By the Court. — Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
255 N.W. 267, 216 Wis. 26, 1934 Wisc. LEXIS 265, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/whyte-v-lindblom-wis-1934.