Whittingham v. Township of Millburn

102 A. 1055, 90 N.J.L. 348, 1916 N.J. LEXIS 396
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided December 5, 1916·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review will be affirmed, for the reasons given in the per curiam in Whittingham v. Township of Millburn et al., No. 125, present term of this court, ante p. 344.

For affirmance—The Chancellor, Chibe Justice, Garrison, Trenci-iard, Black, White, Heppeniieimer, Williams, Gardner, JJ. 9.

For reversal—Parker, Bergen, JJ. 2.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Whittingham v. Township of Millburn, 102 A. 1055, 90 N.J.L. 348, 1916 N.J. LEXIS 396 (N.J. 1916).

102 A. 1055 (Whittingham v. Township of Millburn) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.