Whittingham v. Township of Millburn

100 A. 854, 90 N.J.L. 344, 1916 N.J. LEXIS 395
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedDecember 5, 1916
StatusPublished

This text of 100 A. 854 (Whittingham v. Township of Millburn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Whittingham v. Township of Millburn, 100 A. 854, 90 N.J.L. 344, 1916 N.J. LEXIS 395 (N.J. 1916).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review will he affirmed, for the reasons set forth in the opinion of the Supreme Court.

For affirmance,—The Chancellor, Chibe Justice, Garrison, Trenchard, Black, White, Heppenheimer, Williams, Gardner, JJ. 9.

For reversal—Parker, Bergen, JJ. 2.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
100 A. 854, 90 N.J.L. 344, 1916 N.J. LEXIS 395, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/whittingham-v-township-of-millburn-nj-1916.