Home/Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court/Whittaker v. Inhabitants of West Boylston

Whittaker v. Inhabitants of West Boylston

97 Mass. 273
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedOctober 15, 1867
StatusPublished
Cited by30 cases

This text of 97 Mass. 273 (Whittaker v. Inhabitants of West Boylston) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Whittaker v. Inhabitants of West Boylston, 97 Mass. 273 (Mass. 1867).

Opinion

Bigelow, C. J.

The numerous authorities cited by the plaintiff’s counsel show that the point of law on which the defendants relied in support of their motion for a new trial is untenable. But if it were otherwise, they cannot avail themselves of a point of law not raised at the trial as a ground of setting aside the verdict on a motion for a new trial. Kidney v Richards, 10 Allen, 419. Doyle v. Dixon, ante, 213.

Judgment on verdict.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Elchuk v. Nestle's Milk Products, Inc.
8 Mass. App. Div. 232 (Mass. Dist. Ct., App. Div., 1943)
Peterson v. Hopson
29 N.E.2d 140 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1940)
Pyke v. City of Jamestown
107 N.W. 359 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1906)
Garrity v. Higgins
58 N.E. 1010 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1901)
City of Litchfield v. Anglim
83 Ill. App. 55 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1899)
Parker v. Griffith
51 N.E. 462 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1898)
Olson v. Schultz
36 L.R.A. 790 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1897)
Erslew v. New Orleans & Northeastern Railroad
21 So. 153 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1896)
Simonds v. City of Baraboo
67 N.W. 40 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1896)
Pitman v. City of El Reno
37 P. 851 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1894)
Village of Clayton v. Brooks
150 Ill. 97 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1894)
McGuinness v. City of Worcester
35 N.E. 1068 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1894)
City of Denver v. Soloman
2 Colo. App. 534 (Colorado Court of Appeals, 1892)
Holdsworth v. Tucker
18 N.E. 430 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1888)
Osborne v. City of Detroit
32 F. 36 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Michigan, 1886)
Commonwealth v. Morrison
134 Mass. 189 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1883)
Toledo, Wabash & Western Railway Co. v. Brannagan
75 Ind. 490 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1881)
Dewire v. Bailey
131 Mass. 169 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1881)
Looney v. McLean
129 Mass. 33 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1880)
Swoboda v. Ward
40 Mich. 420 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1879)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
97 Mass. 273, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/whittaker-v-inhabitants-of-west-boylston-mass-1867.