Holdsworth v. Tucker
18 N.E. 430, 147 Mass. 572, 1888 Mass. LEXIS 161
Opinion
The question of law which the plaintiff now attempts to raise was open to her at the trial. As she did not then raise' it, she cannot avail herself of it upon a motion for a new trial. No appeal lies from the order of the Superior Court overruling the motion for a new trial. Whittaker v. West Boylston, 97 Mass. 273, and cases cited.
Appeal dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Holdsworth v. Tucker, 18 N.E. 430, 147 Mass. 572, 1888 Mass. LEXIS 161 (Mass. 1888).
18 N.E. 430 (Holdsworth v. Tucker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Bracken v. City of Newton
5 Mass. App. Dec. 98 (Mass. Dist. Ct., App. Div., 1953)
Ahlgrim & Son v. Wolf
29 N.E.2d 436 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1940)
Restuccia v. Bonner
192 N.E. 17 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1934)
Morelli v. Thombs
172 N.E. 381 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1930)
Commonwealth v. Gedzium
159 N.E. 51 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1927)
Neighbors v. Thistle Down Co.
159 N.E. 111 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1926)
Loveland v. Rand
85 N.E. 948 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1908)
Garrity v. Higgins
58 N.E. 1010 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1901)
White v. Pease
49 P. 416 (Utah Supreme Court, 1897)