Whitt v. Harris Teeter, Inc.

614 S.E.2d 531, 359 N.C. 625
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided July 1, 2005·No. 416A04·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

614 S.E.2d 531 (2005)
359 N.C. 625

Wendy WHITT
v.
HARRIS TEETER, INC. and Randy Shultz.

No. 416A04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

July 1, 2005.

Kennedy, Kennedy, Kennedy and Kennedy, L.L.P., by Harvey L. Kennedy, Harold L. Kennedy, III, and Annie Brown Kennedy, Winston-Salem, for plaintiff-appellee.

Womble Carlyle Sandridge & Rice, by Lucretia D. Guia, Winston-Salem, and J. Mark Sampson, Greensboro, for defendant-appellant Harris Teeter, Inc.

Patterson Harkavy, L.L.P., by Burton Craige, Raleigh, for North Carolina Association of Women Attorneys, North Carolina Academy of Trial Lawyers, Southern States Police Benevolent Association, Inc., North Carolina Police Benevolent Association, Inc., and North Carolina Association of Educators; Suzanne Reynolds, Winston_Salem, for North Carolina Association of Women Attorneys, and Charles E. Daye, Chapel, for North Carolina Academy of Trial Lawyers, amici curiae.

*532 PER CURIAM.

For the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion, the decision of the Court of Appeals is reversed.

REVERSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Whitt v. Harris Teeter, Inc., 614 S.E.2d 531, 359 N.C. 625 (N.C. 2005).

614 S.E.2d 531 (Whitt v. Harris Teeter, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Draughon v. Smith
E.D. North Carolina, 2021
Carmon v. Dance
E.D. North Carolina, 2021
Howard v. College of the Albemarle
262 F. Supp. 3d 322 (E.D. North Carolina, 2017)
Cripe, Inc. v. Clark
834 N.E.2d 731 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 2005)