Whitt v. Harris Teeter, Inc.
This text of 614 S.E.2d 531 (Whitt v. Harris Teeter, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Wendy WHITT
v.
HARRIS TEETER, INC. and Randy Shultz.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Kennedy, Kennedy, Kennedy and Kennedy, L.L.P., by Harvey L. Kennedy, Harold L. Kennedy, III, and Annie Brown Kennedy, Winston-Salem, for plaintiff-appellee.
Womble Carlyle Sandridge & Rice, by Lucretia D. Guia, Winston-Salem, and J. Mark Sampson, Greensboro, for defendant-appellant Harris Teeter, Inc.
Patterson Harkavy, L.L.P., by Burton Craige, Raleigh, for North Carolina Association of Women Attorneys, North Carolina Academy of Trial Lawyers, Southern States Police Benevolent Association, Inc., North Carolina Police Benevolent Association, Inc., and North Carolina Association of Educators; Suzanne Reynolds, Winston_Salem, for North Carolina Association of Women Attorneys, and Charles E. Daye, Chapel, for North Carolina Academy of Trial Lawyers, amici curiae.
*532 PER CURIAM.
For the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion, the decision of the Court of Appeals is reversed.
REVERSED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
614 S.E.2d 531, 359 N.C. 625, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/whitt-v-harris-teeter-inc-nc-2005.