Whitney v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Whitney v. State

973 S.W.2d 481, 334 Ark. 241, 1998 Ark. LEXIS 480

CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas

DecidedSeptember 10, 1998

DocketCR 98-922

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 973 S.W.2d 481 (Whitney v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Whitney v. State, 973 S.W.2d 481, 334 Ark. 241, 1998 Ark. LEXIS 480 (Ark. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Appellant Donnie Whitney has filed a motion for belated appeal from the order denying his petition for postconviction relief pursuant to A.R.Cr.P. Rule 37. His attorney, Marsha Basinger, states that the order denying postconviction relief was signed by the trial court on January 7, 1998, but that the order was not filed with the circuit clerk until February 4, 1998. The notice of appeal, however, was filed on January 28, 1998. Hence, under Rule 2 of the Arkansas Rules of Appellate Procedure — Criminal, the notice of appeal was of no effect. See also Mixon v. State, 328 Ark. 534, 944 S.W.2d 829 (1997) (per curiam).

This court will grant a motion for belated appeal when the attorney admits that the notice of appeal was not timely filed due to an error on his or her part. See, e.g., Brazil v. State, 332 Ark. 74, 959 S.W.2d 55 (1998) (per curiam). Similarly, this court will grant a belated appeal from an order denying a petition for postconviction relief if the movant shows good cause for the failure to file a timely notice of appeal. Elkins v. State, 300 Ark. 320, 778 S.W.2d 609 (1989) (per curiam); Garner v. State, 293 Ark. 309, 737 S.W.2d 637 (1987) (per curiam). Here, the attorney does not admit fault. This court has held that a statement that it was someone else’s fault or no one’s fault will not suffice. Id.; Clark v. State, 289 Ark. 382, 711 S.W.2d 162 (1986) (per curiam). Accordingly, Appellant’s motion must be denied.

Appellant’s attorney shall file within thirty days from the date of this per curiam order a motion and affidavit in this case accepting full responsibility for not timely filing the notice of appeal, and upon filing same, the motion for belated appeal will be granted and a copy of the opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct. See Harkness v. State, 264 Ark. 561, 572 S.W.2d 835 (1978).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Appellant Donnie Whitney has filed a motion for belated appeal from the order denying his petition for postconviction relief pursuant to A.R.Cr.P. Rule 37. His attorney, Marsha Basinger, states that the order denying postconviction relief was signed by the trial court on January 7, 1998, but that the order was not filed with the circuit clerk until February 4, 1998. The notice of appeal, however, was filed on January 28, 1998. Hence, under Rule 2 of the Arkansas Rules of Appellate Procedure — Criminal, the notice of appeal was of no effect. See also Mixon v. State, 328 Ark. 534, 944 S.W.2d 829 (1997) (per curiam).

This court will grant a motion for belated appeal when the attorney admits that the notice of appeal was not timely filed due to an error on his or her part. See, e.g., Brazil v. State, 332 Ark. 74, 959 S.W.2d 55 (1998) (per curiam). Similarly, this court will grant a belated appeal from an order denying a petition for postconviction relief if the movant shows good cause for the failure to file a timely notice of appeal. Elkins v. State, 300 Ark. 320, 778 S.W.2d 609 (1989) (per curiam); Garner v. State, 293 Ark. 309, 737 S.W.2d 637 (1987) (per curiam). Here, the attorney does not admit fault. This court has held that a statement that it was someone else’s fault or no one’s fault will not suffice. Id.; Clark v. State, 289 Ark. 382, 711 S.W.2d 162 (1986) (per curiam). Accordingly, Appellant’s motion must be denied.

Appellant’s attorney shall file within thirty days from the date of this per curiam order a motion and affidavit in this case accepting full responsibility for not timely filing the notice of appeal, and upon filing same, the motion for belated appeal will be granted and a copy of the opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct. See Harkness v. State, 264 Ark. 561, 572 S.W.2d 835 (1978).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

973 S.W.2d 481, 334 Ark. 241, 1998 Ark. LEXIS 480, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/whitney-v-state-ark-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack