Whitney v. Bronx-Lebanon Hospital Center

2017 NY Slip Op 4082, 150 A.D.3d 587, 55 N.Y.S.3d 206
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 23, 2017
Docket4081
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 2017 NY Slip Op 4082 (Whitney v. Bronx-Lebanon Hospital Center) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Whitney v. Bronx-Lebanon Hospital Center, 2017 NY Slip Op 4082, 150 A.D.3d 587, 55 N.Y.S.3d 206 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2017).

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Lizbeth Gonzalez, J.), entered on or about December 7, 2016, which granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff failed to make a prima facie showing of discrimination because she failed to plead facts demonstrating that she had any “disability” within the meaning of the New York State Human Rights Law or the New York City Human Rights Law (Matter of McEniry v Landi, 84 NY2d 554, 558 [1994]; Pimentel v Citibank, N.A., 29 AD3d 141, 145 [1st Dept 2006], lv denied 7 *588 NY3d 707 [2006]; see Executive Law §§ 292 [21] [a]; 296 [1] [a]; Administrative Code of City of NY §§ 8-102 [16]; 8-107 [1] [a]). Plaintiff relies solely on a nurse’s note that states that plaintiff suffers from unspecified “chronic medical conditions,” and that her inability to sleep during the day was making those conditions worse. The nurse’s unsworn, conclusory allegations do not suffice to defeat defendants’ motion for summary judgment (Winegrad v New York Univ. Med. Ctr., 64 NY2d 851, 853 [1985]).

Because plaintiff failed to raise triable issues of fact whether she is an individual with a disability, the motion court also correctly dismissed her reasonable accommodation claim. Moreover, to the extent she ever properly requested a transfer to an earlier, evening shift, defendants were aware that there was no position available on the evening shift, and they were not required to reassign her if no position was open (Pimentel, 29 AD3d at 147-148).

Concur—Friedman, J.P., Moskowitz, Fein-man, Gische and Kahn, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Esposito v. State of N.Y. Unified Ct. Sys.
2025 NY Slip Op 30079(U) (New York Supreme Court, New York County, 2025)
Gibbons v. State of New York
2022 NY Slip Op 04153 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2022)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2017 NY Slip Op 4082, 150 A.D.3d 587, 55 N.Y.S.3d 206, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/whitney-v-bronx-lebanon-hospital-center-nyappdiv-2017.